This is a FAQ about white nationalism and its necessity. This page is a modified version (not yet final) of a FAQ originally posted by an individual calling himself “Yggdrasil” (see the original copy here).
The idea that whites may need to create a separate nation as a means of defending themselves, preserving their culture and maintaining a healthy population size.
An individual white nationalist may or may not feel that whites are superior to other races, but it is important to understand that white nationalism is not about espousing or establishing racial superiority. The desire of white nationalists to form their own nation is independent of any supremacist beliefs.
Note that supremacist beliefs do not necessarily correspond to white nationalism. For instance, a white supremacist could believe that “inferior” non-whites should be subservient to whites and work as their slaves, which would usually mean that these slaves will be living in the homeland of whites, but such white supremacists would be a rare find and these individuals are surely not white nationalists because the latter prefer a homeland without any non-whites.
Almost never. As in the previous answer, whereas an individual white nationalist may desire that whites should dominate non-whites, white nationalism has nothing to do with dominating non-whites. In fact, formation of a white nation removes any possibility of white dominance of other races within their homeland, as well as the plausibility of the accusation that whites wish to dominate others since white ethnostates – operating within the vision of white nationalism – will avoid economic manipulation to hurt the prosperity of other nations.
No. A separate white nation would establish a policy of mutually beneficial trade with its new neighbors. Labor markets are global, and the formation of a white nation would not protect whites from economic competition.
Reasons:
It is a long list. Burdensome racial preference schemes in hiring, racial preference schemes in university admissions, racial preference schemes in government contracting and small business loans. Beyond quotas there is the denial of rights of free speech and of due process to whites who are critical of these governmental policies. We have special punishments for assaults committed by whites if the motives might be racial. In addition, whites pay a proportion of the costs of the welfare state that is disproportionate to what they receive in benefits.
But the most exploitative aspect of the situation is that neither the racial quotas, the business preferences, the loss of freedom of speech, nor the disproportionate contributions to the welfare state have managed to sate the appetites of non-whites living in the United States.
The more whites sacrifice, the more non-whites demand. Many whites are beginning to believe that no amount of tribute, other than mass suicide, would satisfy the non-white demands.
If our presence stirs up that much hatred in the hearts of non-whites, then the only sensible course of action is to separate ourselves from them.
Not really. Since 1965, many American whites have taken part in a mass migration or “white flight” away from neighborhoods inhabited by non-whites. Aggressors don't flee. Non-whites are clamoring to enter Western nations in droves. Whites are fleeing en masse to formerly uninhabited areas to escape these new arrivals. In short, many whites are aware of the non-white problem and others are being rapidly educated.
Excellent question! It is true that whites are sometimes exploited by fellow whites, but the major people behind racial preferences and massive non-white immigration to the U.S.A. are the Jews who are hostile toward whites. We expect less resistance by non-Whites to the formation of a white ethnostate that from many white elites and especially Jews.
Whites built America into a nation that is prosperous enough to attract immigrants from around the world. If America were an impoverished Third World nation, there would hardly be any immigration to it. American whites therefore have a right to hold onto what they have built.
American Indians have been exploited by whites, no doubt about it. However, if stealing geographic territory is the issue, American Indians themselves have “stolen” it from previous immigrants. The first immigrants to the Americas were European-like people who were race-replaced by the Asiatic American Indians.
Note that American Indians have their reservations, which effectively serve as their homeland or an ethnostate. American Indians can join related Mexican and other Latino immigrants to form their own ethnostate.
The truth is we don't know yet. Our separate state would follow the geographic outlines of white flight. The model for this state would be the modern gerrymander created by the Voting Rights Act to create majority non-white congressional districts. We would simply cede these to a separate nation. The mechanics of this process will need to be worked out.
Yes. There would be no restriction by country of origin, and no genetic tests, skin color or hair color tests or any nonsense like that. The only restriction would be that those who would wish to recreate the present system by importing non-whites and then encouraging their hostility would not be welcome. They would have to remain in or move to the lands ceded to the non-whites.
For white liberals it is definitely going to feel like a witch hunt! When the time comes, those who are guilty of “integrationism” should do the sensible thing and flee. It will spare us all a lot of pain.
No. A white nation is, by most accounts, a long time off. When a powerful nation like the U.S. is brought to its knees by non-whites, there will be an automatic push for establishing a white ethnostate within U.S. territory, and some other Western nations with an overwhelming white majority will try to effectively convert their country into a white ethnostate.
White separatists will agree on most points with white nationalists, except that they may not see a need to establish a separate nation within the present territorial boundaries of the U.S.
White supremacists are white people who believe that whites are racially superior to non-whites. A white supremacist need not necessarily be a white nationalist, as noted above. A white supremacist is not necessarily a person who intends to exploit, discriminate against or harm non-whites.